Abstract

CSJ-10-0034.0PO One of the trickiest challenges for editors is to determine what constitutes conflict of interest for reporters. This case examines the dilemma which confronted New York Times Executive Editor Bill Keller in February 2010 when critics—including the Times’ own ombudsman—called for transfer of Jerusalem Bureau Chief Ethan Bronner because his adult son had joined the Israeli Defense Forces. Keller did not plan to transfer Bronner, but he did have to decide whether to respond in print. Would a public response help inform the public about the nuanced consideration the Times editors gave such issues, or simply prolong what had been a largely internal disagreement—but now play it out in the public square? This case is written from secondary sources.

Students will gain insights into the challenges of covering any violent and ideologically polarized conflict. They will learn in particular about the history of the New York Times and its coverage of the Middle East, and read about how reporters factor their personal experiences into their professional reporting. Use the case to allow students to debate what contributes to a reporter’s identity and bias, to discuss whether objectivity is a realistic or even a desirable goal, and how journalists can combine passion and conviction with responsible reporting.

Use this case in a class about editorial management, ethics, or international reporting.