Hydro-Management
on Lake Chicamba in Mozambique
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Principle 5: Potential Impacts Filipe's choices combined with possible climate outcomes can be summarized as: 1) Business as usual: keep 40% in reservoir
2) Conservative action: withhold 75% behind the dam
3) Compromise action: withhold 60% in reservoir, and monitor closely
If Filipe manages the dam as he would under normal circumstances (decision
1), he runs a slightly higher risk of running out of water, given that the
forecast suggests enhanced probability of below normal rainfall over the
watershed (scenario 1a). This is especially true given the already low levels
currently in the lake. The societal impacts of running low on water are
But remember, there is a competing goal of minimizing risk of floods. Although the forecast states that there is an increased chance of normal to below-normal rainfall, there is still a 25-30% chance of above-normal rainfall (scenario 1c). If Filipe withholds too much water behind the dam (decision 2) and they get a large storm event Scenario 2c), it is possible he will have to release a lot of water quickly, potentially causing the Revue or Buzi Rivers to overflow their banks, endangering riverside villages. Some compromise level may be best (decision 3). |